The story flips back and forth between the present--Emily calls herself Cat, finds a room, looks for a job--and flashbacks. Childhood, meeting her husband, her relationship with her sister. Good, compelling snippets that are fitting together to show a nice life and hint at the darkness that's coming. I'm having a good time with the book.
But here's where the authorial trust thing comes in. There are some slightly risky things going on here, and I don't know Tina Seskis at all. I have no idea if these choices she's making--the frequent switches of viewpoint character in the flashbacks; the very broad showing-not-telling descriptions of Emily's early childhood--are fumbles or solid choices.
I won't know till we get to the end. Honestly, this is more of a nailbiter for me in a book than actual will-they-won't-they questions about spies getting caught or characters hooking up--is the author giving me a flashback to this secondary character's childhood for a reason? Or just because they thought it was interesting character building? Are we going to delve into everyone's past as we go on, or was that one non-Emily history a one-off? The tension, it's killing me.
So far, though, there's some great stuff going on here. I love detailed how-tos, and there's some great "how to walk out of your life" stuff here (it helps that she has valid ID with her maiden name on it), and the vignettes from the past and the present are well-drawn, frequently touching, and sympathetic.
Of course, a lot of the success of this book is going to hinge on what I presume is the Big Reveal. I'll let you know how that turns out.
No comments:
Post a Comment